Remember that although viewing short-term outcomes in isolation may not give definitive information about whether quality representation is occuring in a jurisdiction, they also can lead to some important inferences.

Think about what you have learned in this section of the module. What are some data points a CIP can use to assess meaningful integration of youth voice into advocacy? Are those data points present? What do they tell you about quality legal representation in this jurisdiction?

Look back at the data - what does it tell you about youth attendance in court? About engagement? What information is missing? What more would you want to know to make a determination about the role of quality legal representation in youth participation in court?