OUTCOME	DATA POINTS: LOOK FOR INCREASES IN:
Frequency and Quality of Client Contact	Client contact outside of the courthouse Youth reports of satisfaction with frequency and quality of contact from attorney Attorney shares information in court that was learned directly from the youth Attorney’s advocacy is grounded in the youth’s strengths, needs, and challenges
Frequency and Quality of In-Court Advocacy	Oral and written motions by youth’s attorney Objections made by youth’s attorney Citations to state and federal law by youth’s attorney Evidence/testimony introduced by youth’s attorney Requests for court orders by youth’s attorney
Frequency and Quality of Out-of-Court Advocacy	Court is reserved for contested issues Case issues are resolved by collaboration, mediation, and negotiation outside of court Attorney’s advocacy is informed by independent information gathered outside of court Case professionals/key players in youth’s life know the attorney Attorney demonstrates holistic understanding of youth’s needs outside of legal needs (educational, medical, mental health, family)
Meaningful Integration of Client Voice into Advocacy	Youth preparedness for court Youth attendance in court Attorney presents youth’s opinion, position, and requests at court hearings Youth presents own opinion, position, and requests at court hearings Youth reports of satisfaction with attorney’s level of engagement