This case example gave a very limited view of attorney representation in this jurisdiction, and was almost exclusively focused on practices inside the courtroom. You may have found the data helpful to point out indicators of some attorney strengths and challenges. From the data, it seems like attorneys in this jurisdiction might be skilled in engaging clients in court, questioning witnesses at trial, opposing supervised visitation, and filing motions. You might also be concerned about the quality of attorney-client contact, the independence of attorney advocacy and investigations, and attorney knowledge beyond local law.

You also might have felt frustrated by the limited data available and the fact that it led to more questions than answers. However, even limited data can serve an important purpose - by helping determine what more information and data is needed. This limited data on indicators of quality legal representation is a start, but it is not the end of the story. Additional data might be helpful to make a full assessment of quality legal representation in this jurisdiction.