Remember that one indicator of quality legal representation is an attorney’s knowledge of and ability to apply the relevant law and social science research. The data collected presented a few places (reasonable efforts, parent-child visitation) where state and local statutes and rules may be insufficient to make a full and robust argument on behalf of the youth. Some red flags regarding attorney knowledge are present, based on the limited data collected (failure to raise reasonable efforts; only citing to state law regarding parent-child visitation arguments). But there is a lot the data does not tell us here. In cases where reasonable efforts arguments were raised, what arguments did attorneys make and how did they support those arguments? Why was reasonable efforts raised so infrequently? What arguments did attorneys make when supporting supervised visits, and what sources of law did they cite? The data here is incomplete too make any meaningful conclusions about attorney knowledge.